Alan R. Kahn of Kahn Brothers Group Inc.seems to be a serial plaintiff. Do you have any information on Alan R. Kahn - Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC

Alan R. Kahn of Kahn Brothers Group Inc. seems to be a serial plaintiff. Must be how Alan R. Kahn of Kahn Brothers Group Inc. - makes a living.

Alan R. Kahn is the co-founder of New York investment advisory firm Kahn Brothers & Co. founded in 1978 and doing business today as Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC.

Alan R. Kahn's Firm - Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC - is said to be an employee owned investment manager with approximately $827 million in assets under management.

Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC , Alan R. Kahn primarily provides services to individuals and also manages accounts for pension and profit sharing plans, charitable organizations and corporations.

Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC , Alan R. Kahn invests in value stocks of small-cap and mid-cap companies and employs quantitative and fundamental analysis with a bottom-up stock picking approach.

Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC , Alan R. Kahn typically holds its investments for a period between three years and five years.

Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC , Alan R. Kahn left Kahn Brothers & Co. to become a private activist shareholder in a portfolio of companies ? Do you have a Whistleblower tip on Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC , Alan R. Kahn or on Kahn Brothers & Co. ?

Alan R. Kahn of Kahn Brothers Group Inc. seems to have made a career out of suing boards of companies via class action and derivative suits, and sponsoring proposals for and against management, is this true?


Alan R. Kahn of Kahn Brothers Group Inc. certainly seems to be a serial plaintiff to me.

It seems that around 60 cases were filed by Kahn Brothers Advisors LLC , Alan R. Kahn in the last 10 years alone, 23 of which were in Delaware Chancery Court.

There seems to be many cases brought by Alan R. Kahn's daughters.

Most of these cases seem to be for breach of fiduciary duty, so is this Alan R. Kahn of Kahn Brothers Group Inc.'s Specialty ?

Most of the of the Alan R. Kahn Lawsuits / Cases seem to have settled eventually, but some after protracted litigation, it would seem - what is the Real Story on all these Lawsuits over the last decade that Alan R. Kahn has filed?

There seems to be at least one case in which Alan R. Kahn filed for a TRO to enjoin the transaction, is this true? Hmmm.. it seems Alan R. Kahn's motion was denied on this.

Kahn v. Tremont was apparently filed in Delaware Chancery Court in 1991. In it, Alan R. Kahn alleged unfair treatment in connection with Tremont's purchases of NL Industries from Valhi Inc. at a time when Valhi allegedly controlled Tremont and NL Industries.

The case went to trial in 1996, where Alan R. Kahn apparently lost. Alan R. Kahn seems to have appealed to the Delaware Supreme Court, which reversed and remanded apparently because of an error having to do with the burden of persuasion applied at trial.

VC Lamb got the case on remand and opened the record more more evidence. The case settled in 1998. Much more on the Details of this Lawsuit and Every Lawsuit that Alan R. Kahn of Kahn Brothers Group Inc. filed in the last decade.

Do you have a Tip on any of the Serial Lawsuits filed by Alan R. Kahn of Kahn Brothers Group Inc. ? If so eMail me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Got a Tip on Alan Kahn Lawsuits, Kahn Brothers Group Inc., ?

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Read more...

Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group LLC - Chapter 11 Trustee Summit 1031 Exchange Bankruptcy

Why Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox Says Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance LLC is a Liar.

There are Many Reasons Why I Claim that Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance LLC is a Thug, Thief and a Liar.. Many More Will Continue to Post.. in Detail .. as Oregon Attorney David Aman of Tonkon Torp LLP Law Firm sent me a Cease and Desist Requesting that I Stop saying such Facts about his Client Oregon Attorney Kevin Padrick for Obsidian Finance Portland Oregon.

In the Summit 1031 Press Release, it was announced that Summit would be declaring Chapter 11 bankruptcy, Terry Vance - Oregon Attorney was the Chief Restructuring Officer who then, at the advisement of Sussman Shank, Summit Accommodators, Inc.’s attorneys, hired Obsidian Finance Group, LLC as their financial consultants to provide advice on all tax issues affecting Summit Customers and a plan to mitigate damages to the maximum extent possible of currently unfunded exchanges.

It is also my understanding that Obsidian Finance Group, LLC was retained to review substantial real estate investments and to recommend the best method to realize value of such investments to satisfy outstanding claims. Obsidian Finance Group, LLC is a national financial consulting firm, which specializes in distressed enterprises and assets.

Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, LLC,, who is 50% owner of Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, presented to the Summit Shareholders that he had friends with deep pockets who would help fund their short-term liquidity crisis. (Did Kevin Padrick Lie ?_

Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, never mentioned Ponzi Scheme; he just kept calling it a short-term liquidity crisis. Then later it was a Ponzi Scheme? Double Talk, Lies, Greed.. ??

The Summit Shareholders of course wanted this our short term liquidity crisis Solution, it would benefit all and get them out of hot water. But Of Course Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, LLC Flat Out LIED..

Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, did none of these things in this agreement and the press release. Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group came in immediately and took all of the information then used this privileged information Against their Client and STOLE the Job of the LUCRATIVE position of Chapter 11 Trustee in a 40 Million Dollar Oregon Bankruptcy.. (Hence Liar and Thief)

Click Here for Lies, Agreement from Kevin Padrick, Obsidian Finance Group, LLC

Click Here for Press Release, Information to Summit 1031 Creditors

Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group told the Summit Principals they would be back in two weeks with a proposal. Instead, they took the privileged financial information and Summit spreadsheet on the properties the Summit Principals were always from day one going to turn over to the bankruptcy estate to the Creditor’s Committee.

Who Was Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group really working for when he illegally, unethically, corruptly got this financial information and used it to make himself TONS of money?

Was Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group working for the Creditor’s Committee or Terry Vance, CRO of Summit? Looks like Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance had no intention on completing his contract with Terry Vance and Summit because they did not receive any proposals or any word from Kevin Padrick after Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group got what he needed to steal the Chapter 11 Trustee Job.

Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group took this privileged information to the other side and sold them something else. Something like we will sue Umpqua, we will take away interests’ from innocent people by suing them, we will sue every attorney who ever did work for Summit . Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group probably never mentioned how much assets the Summit Principals were handing over already. This way he could get more MONEY for him and cheat the Creditors.. , oh in my opinion..

Cash $14 Million
Bond $10 Million
E&O $3 Million
Note Receivable – Steve White $1.2 Million
Property Investments - $11.5 Million
Business Interests - $1 Million

The Initial Amount being handed over voluntarily by the Summit Shareholders was $40.7 Million. Summit only owed $28 Million.

Since the beginning Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group, and Tonkon Torp have taken interests’ in property from innocent investors, they passed on sales that would’ve brought more money to the bankruptcy estate, either because they weren’t going to get their 15% commission at the time or because they were trying to squash innocent investor’s who were in their way. (Thug and Thief? You Bet)

Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group also got a settlement of $16.8 Million from the Summit Shareholders, they got an unknown settlement from Umpqua Bank, and just the other day they are suing every attorney Summit ever used. Not to mention that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group already collected the Bond of $10 Million, the E&O of $3 Million, the business interest of $1 Million and Several Million in Property Investments.

So Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group made money hand over fist for 2 years and counting, and he wants me to SHUT Up so he can keep making money.

It would be impossible to get an exact amount of what Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group and Tonkon Torp has received and disbursed. They have jumbled the books I'll bet, and taken a piece of every dirty deal.. above the law and with no oversight or transparency what so ever.

It would seem that they don’t have to report what type of money came in and what type of payments went out and to whom. No one is monitoring this money and they are dealing with Millions upon Millions.

Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group - Tax Fraud? Fraud Against the Government? Gee ya Think?

The Summit Principals also did their own 1031 Exchanges during the past years as they purchased and sold properties. When you do an exchange you have deferred gain that you don’t pay tax on until you sell the property.

When Kevin Padrick as Chapter 11 trustee did a turnover of all the assets to his liquidating trust, these deferred gains became tax liabilities to the liquidating trust. However, Obsidian Finance’s accounting staff is conveniently leaving these deferred gains out of their tax returns.

They make plugs to the capital accounts of the Summit Shareholders to get rid of the deferred gain upon the sale or disposition of the property. For an example, Kevin Padrick just gave away the Summit Shareholders’ interest in Century Drive Mobile Home Park to another owner named Jim Hull.

Upon Disposition, the trust should have recognized around $600,000 of taxable gain on behalf of the interest owned by Mark Neuman and Brian Stevens.

No such gain was reported on this tax return and the tax of $174,000 (20% to IRS and 9% to Oregon ) was never paid by the liquidating trust.

Why would Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group pay the tax when no one is monitoring his work?

Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group would rather keep this MONEY and file more lawsuits to help pad his pockets some more.

There are many more properties with large amounts of deferred gain and related tax liability that are probably not being reported. I, you can file a Whistleblower Lawsuit and get 30% of recovery of what Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group has frauded the U.S. Government.

The IRS and the Oregon Department of Revenue should really look at this, because it means there is a lot of missing tax dollars to our federal and state governments.

When will be enough money for Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance?

Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group - Thug and Thief will run this score out for as long as he can because he has and can get much, much more money than what is due to the creditors. He will be paying his attorneys, Tonkon Torp for cease and desist orders and lawsuits, while Obsidian Finance Group LLC gets 15% commissions on all sales and Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group spends oodles of hours working so very hard to pad his own pockets that paying back the creditors will be the very last thing he does.

Much More Coming Soon.. as David Aman, for the Corrupt Oregon Attorney Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group - has sent me a Cease and Desist so I must prove the LIES and Illegal Activity on the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy out of Bend Oregon ... So stay Tuned..

I Sure am Going be Busy Proving that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Group Oregon Lies, Commits Fraud, Breaks the Law and is a THUG and a Thief.

more at

http://www.obsidianfinancesucks.com/

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Read more...

Philip Falcone - Harbinger Capital Partners Fund - Harbinger Group - Spectrum Brands

"Philip Falcone Finds a New Way to Raise Money Harbinger's chief, facing investor redemptions, will use a shell company to pay for acquisitions

Philip Falcone, the hedge fund manager who made a fortune betting against subprime mortgages in 2007, has hit a tough patch. His flagship Harbinger Capital Partners Fund and another fund under his control have faced redemption calls from major investors anxious about the funds' investments in a wireless satellite network.

Harbinger Capital is also at the center of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's office over a $113 million loan it gave to Harbinger Capital Partners founder and Chief Executive Officer Falcone to cover a tax bill, according to two people with knowledge of the probe. Falcone, who declined an interview request, said in an e-mail that the loan "was documented and audited by outside accountants and legal advisers."

Despite his troubles, the hedge fund manager has found a way to raise funds in a difficult environment. Falcone, 48, is selling stock and bonds through Harbinger Group (HRG), a publicly traded shell company.

On Nov. 15, Harbinger Group raised $350 million by selling five-year debt yielding 11 percent. Falcone plans to use the new capital to buy controlling stakes in industries from agriculture to telecommunications, according to a Nov. 1 filing by Harbinger with the SEC.

To back the bonds, Harbinger hedge funds plan to give Harbinger Group most of their majority stake in Spectrum Brands (SPB), a publicly traded company whose products include Rayovac batteries and George Foreman grills, in exchange for additional Harbinger Group Stock.

Most hedge funds raise money from institutional investors, such as pension funds, that can withdraw their money under certain circumstances. Owning a publicly traded company allows Falcone to pay for acquisitions by issuing stock. "Our corporate structure provides significant advantages compared to the traditional hedge fund structure for long-term holdings," Harbinger Group said in the Nov. 1 SEC filing.

Redemption calls are a worry now at Harbinger. Goldman Sachs (GS) plans to pull its entire $120 million investment from Harbinger Capital Partners following a 15 percent decline this year through mid-October and the disclosure about the personal loan to Falcone, according to people briefed on Goldman's plans.

Other investors such as Advantage Advisers Management, a subsidiary of Oppenheimer Asset Management, have also indicated they want out, according to regulatory filings. Falcone's New York-based firm's overall assets have declined to about $9 billion, as of September, from $26 billion in mid-2008.

Falcone has angered some clients by investing about 90 percent of his flagship Harbinger Capital Partners Fund and more than half his Special Situations Fund in wireless-telecommunications investments, as of September. He is trying to build a multibillion-dollar satellite wireless network that would take on entrenched players such as AT&T (T) and Verizon Communications (VZ) through a company he created called LightSquared.

Falcone is liquidating about 80 percent of the $2 billion Special Situations Fund at the request of clients, investors say. He's been trying since June to raise $1 billion to $1.5 billion for LightSquared from investors who would be willing to commit capital for several years, according to potential investors who have seen marketing documents.

In theory, Falcone could use shares of Harbinger Group, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYX), to meet redemptions in his hedge funds, says David Guin, head of the U.S. securities practice at law firm Withers Bergman in New York.

Harbinger spokesman Jeffrey Zelkowitz says the proceeds of the bond sale won't be used to cover redemptions or finance investments in LightSquared. "Rather, HGI is a permanent capital vehicle to house longer-term controlling equity stakes in companies that operate across a diversified set of industries."

Falcone created Harbinger Group last year, when three of Harbinger's hedge funds paid $74 million to acquire a 51.6 percent stake in Zapata, an oil driller with cash and no operating businesses that was co-founded by President George H.W. Bush.

Falcone reincorporated Zapata as Harbinger Group in December and later moved its headquarters to Manhattan from Rochester, N.Y. Having Harbinger Group gives Falcone a degree of freedom he doesn't have now, says Daniel Celeghin, a partner at Casey, Quirk & Associates, a Darien (Conn.)-based consultant to investment advisory firms: "Here is a pool of money you can manage indefinitely, and you don't have to worry about redemptions."

The bottom line: While dealing with investor redemptions, Falcone is raising capital through a public company he took over. "

Source of Post
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/10_49/b4206051251677.htm

Read more...

Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Patent Attorney at Proskauer Rose Law Firm CONSPIRES with MPEG LA to Commit Massive Fraud and Anti-Trust Violations

MPEG-LA hit by antitrust suit over video codecs. Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Patent Attorney Proskauer Rose DOES it Again...

MPEG LA has been in the Illegal - Unethical
Patent Pooling Business for Years.

Proskauer Rose Law Firm has made a Living and Lifetime Business of Billion Dollar Corruption Schemes and screwing over investors. And Well Proskauer Rose's Patent Department has a Billion Dollar Patent Pooling Scheme going on with the help of Corrupt Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein and the Illegal, Secret Patent Pool technology Stealing Schemes of MPEG LA.

Corrupt Law Firm ... Proskauer Rose Corrupt Law Firm...

MPEG-LA hit by antitrust suit over video codecs - MPEG LA is Corrupt, it is my understand that MPEG LA Stole a Trillion Dollar Patent with the Aid of Corrupt Law Firms, Tech Companies, Patent Attorneys and Executives

"MPEG-LA hit by antitrust suit over video codecs

German software maker Nero has filed an antitrust complaint against MPEG-LA, the company that oversees licensing for the H.264 video codec favoured by Microsoft and Apple.

MPEG-LA (MPEG Licensing Authority) controls the licenses for the pools of patents needed to use the MPEG-2, MPEG-4 and AVC/H.264 video standards.

As such, it collects royalties from the sale or distribution of almost every PC, DVD, DVD player, digital TV set, TV set-top box, still camera, video camera, iPhone and BlackBerry in the world.

Nero, best known for its CD burning software, alleges that MPEG-LA abuses its monopoly power in these technology markets.

The company filed its antitrust complaint in California district court in Los Angeles on 14 May, seeking unspecified monetary damages and an injunction to halt the alleged anti-competitive actions.

"Absolute power has corrupted MPEG-LA absolutely,"

Nero maintained in its complaint.

"Once MPEG-LA obtained monopoly power in the relevant technology markets, it used that power to wilfully maintain or extend its monopolies for years beyond their natural expiration... and administer its licences in an unfair, unreasonable, and discriminatory manner that stifles competition and innovation, and harms consumers."

MPEG-LA charges licensees different amounts for the same MPEG-2 patent, collects administration fees and royalties multiple times for the same device, and does not communicate its policies adequately to certain licensees, according to Nero.

"By remaining silent on vital aspects of its licensing programs, MPEG-LA has created a system that favours some licensees, such as insiders (ie, licensors), and disfavours others, such as outsiders (ie, non-licensor licensees)," Nero's complaint read.

"As a result, outsiders such as Nero have great difficulty planning technology changes and embarking on programmes to research, develop and implement technological innovations — and are charged supracompetitive royalties on distributions as to which they never agreed to pay royalties — while other licensees, such as insiders, do not face such problems."

According to Nero's complaint, MPEG-LA only obtained monopoly power in the relevant audio and video codec markets after getting assurances in 1997 that the Department of Justice (DoJ) would not launch antitrust proceedings against it.

These assurances were conditional on patent pools not being used to stifle competition, Nero stated. It added that MPEG-LA suggested to the DoJ at the time that the pool for MPEG-2 contained no more than 53 essential patents.

MPEG-LA subsequently added around 800 patents it deemed to be essential to the MPEG-2 pool, so as to extend the duration of the codec's licence, Nero said.

The company did the same thing with the MPEG-4 pool, which now includes more than 1,000 patents, and the AVC/H.264 pool, now with over 1,300 patents, according to the filing.

AVC/H.264 is the video codec of choice for Microsoft, which will support it natively in Internet Explorer 9, and for Apple, which is backing it as a superior alternative to Flash.

While Google also supports H.264 in Chrome, it recently open-sourced its own alternative, VP8, in a bid to provide a free alternative to the proprietary and paid-for H.264.

As part of its complaint, Nero said that MPEG-LA used its own patent counsel, Kenneth Rubenstein, as "a so-called 'independent' expert" to evaluate the essentiality of patents.

MPEG-LA had not responded at the time of writing to a request on Tuesday for comment on Nero's allegations. The next stage in the case will be for MPEG-LA to answer Nero's complaint. ""

http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/regulation/2010/05/25/mpeg-la-hit-by-antitrust-suit-over-video-codecs-40089042/

Lets See How German Tech Companies Handle the Corrupt,
UnEthical and Illegal Behavior of MPEG LA....

Ok so a Decade after Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt MPEG LA - Proskauer Rose Law Firm Patent Attorney, helped MPEG LA to steal the Holy Grail of Video / Technology inventions in which we all use every day and have for years upon years, well now this same Corrupt Patent Attorney is involved in more patent theft and illegal patent pool... why is Proskauer Rose standing with Kenneth Rubenstein?

I mean Christopher Wheeler was involved in this stolen patent and he was pushed out.. Kenneth Rubenstein was not even at Proskauer Rose when he first started his patent theft FOR MPEG LA to illegally pool the iviewit technologies in patent pools to hide their existence.. then Corrupt Law Firm Proskauer Rose hired Kenneth Rubenstein after he already lied to the Iviewit Company and said that he was with Proskauer Rose.. so Corrupt Law Firm - Proskauer Rose must be getting billions from MPEG LA dirty dealings or they would not have harbored a CRIMINAL for so long.. also see.. Proskauer ROSE was the reason for the Fall of Enron with this patent .. this technology theft.. and no accountable?

Well that day has come... Unless of Course Corrupt Proskauer Rose also owns judges, ethics committees, supreme courts, and patent officials in Germany as Well as the US?

I will discuss a WHOLE lot more about MPEG LA, Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer ROSE and the Horrible Injustice, Flat Out Fraud, Shareholder Deception, and more that surrounds MPEG LA - Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Patent Attorney STEALING a Trillion Dollar Technology and Illegally Pooling this Technology in MPEG patent Pools.. all orchestrated by ONE very Corrupt Patent attorney Kenneth Rubenstein..

PS don't forget.. MPEG and APPLE are seeming quite cozy and Bruce Sewell knew about Iviewit .. while at Intel and when informed went to APPLE.. more on that later..

Collecting Royalties from Stolen Technologies and Illegal Patent Pooling,
What an Incredible Racket... Billions hand over Fist on Someone Else's Invention .. and many of these inventors are harassed, bankrupted, their cars bombed and well just plain ol' SHUT Up..

Here are some Sites for more information in the iViewit Stolen Technology and the Illegal Patent Pooling Tricks and Schemes at MPEG LA with the Help of Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein that has created Massive Shareholder Fraud that is now a High Profile SEC Complaint and a Federal RICO Lawsuit .. still undisclosed to unsuspecting shareholders of IBM, Intel Corp, AOL, Time Warner Inc. , Lockheed Martin, Warner Bros. , SGI, and More involved in the Blatant Theft of a Trillion Dollar Technology that We all used Every Day...

www.Iviewit.TV

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.ProskauerSucks.com

www.KennethRubenstein.com

www.BruceSewell.com

www.JeffreyBewkes.com

www.CEOpaulOtellini.com

Proskauer Rose bio Clip on Kenneth Rubenstein"


" Kenneth Rubenstein is co-head of the Patent Law Group and a Partner in the New York office. He also is a registered patent attorney before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office and a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. While there are numerous patent law groups at various firms, Ken and his group distinguish themselves from competitors by being able to deal with very sophisticated technology. "


Source
http://www.proskauer.com/professionals/Detail.aspx?professional=0eae1af8-e822-4a75-9414-d8ee3f87e890&tabId=0


posted by
Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

more on the MPEG LA stealing and pooling patents
.. at www.iViewit.tv/
and at www.DeniedPatent.com

Read more...

Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Pilgrim's Pride Managers has Hire "ReputationDefender" to Attempt to Cover Up the TRUTH about Pilgrims Pride.

Read more...

Intel Corporation is a Cartel, Intel has a Monopoly - YOU Lose!! Intel will Do ANYTHING to Keep their Wall of Corruption UP.

"FTC Docket 9288, May 1998.. So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?"

Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998..
So How Long has the FTC, SEC, DOJ Protected Intel Corp.?

Over a Decade. And Consumers are Still Paying the Price, Shareholders are Paying for Intel's Crimes and Will SOON pay Billions More.. Tax Payers pay for the Over Looking by Your Governement Agent's of Intel's Crimes..

Prior Reports IGNORED by those Paid to Protect YOU???
when is ENOUGH - Enough with Intel...??

"" Beginning Docket 9288, May 1998, various reports and analysis are submitted by this analyst to FTC now operating in voluntary civic service capacity under Department of Labor Code 3363.5.

Today a decade of analysis delivers tens of
Docket 9341
discovery proofs or pointers to proofs.

Many of which this audience are familiar from prior reports by this analyst submitted to U.S. Senate, Congress, State AGs and U.S. Attorneys.

Under Docket 9341 discovery rules, work from this analyst is passed by FTC Bureau of Competition to Intel for legal rebuttal.

Three Components of Monopoly Recovery

Monopoly recovery is a worldwide financial value having three main components:

1) Consumer recovery is based on the system costs of Intel Inside tied charge back for routing Intel microprocessors across state lines and inter nation boundaries inside a computer chassis.

See prior analyst submissions for specific details covering the illegal aspects of this market rigging rebate fee scheme.

2) Consumer recovery from monopoly price premium associated with some Intel microprocessor and PC product introductions.

3) Industrial harms which include predatory product dumping, Intel selling at a price less then average total cost, measures of variable down to average fixed cost.

Finally, estimation of the marginal cost for Intel to produce a single x86 microprocessor in relation to price sought with variable cost cross check.

Where price is within or lower then average fixed cost, variable or marginal cost, revenues from those quantities are recorded as an industrial monopolization recovery value for FTC discovery.

Consumer Recovery Subset 1; kick back, in violation of Sherman Act Section 1, Section 2, Clayton Act Section 2, 3, 4, 5, 13e, 13c, 13d, Title 48, 1986 anti kickback act

Of the $26.442 billion subset of consumer recovery documented from Intel production estimates (where $42 billion total set is documented by contract), $22.657 billion or 85% is associated with Intel Inside tied charge back sum misrepresented in Intel and PC Dealer financials.

That sum is split between Intel and PC Companies 50:50 for the purpose of this analysis based on the Intel Inside monopoly system metric.

Yet Intel’s portion is known to increase, and PC Companies decrease, over the 15 year duration of this Intel Insider operation.

Intel financials associate Intel Inside as a marketing cost credited to PC Company micro- processor sales. When this commissionable sales value is actually an accrued Dealer rebate passed through Intel as a sales reward for Media Sales Agents taken as their fee, to sustain the supply chain’s product distribution ties between Intel, PC Dealers and Media Agent’s sales channels.

Sales Channels include PC Week, PC Magazine, Computer Shopper, Family Computing, PC World, Windows Magazine, other PC and some general media.

Rebate Values are Sustained from back in time with
forward time purchase agreements.

Production short run to short run, Dealer’s microprocessor purchases are unnaturally weighted to benefit them guiding Media Agents sales preferences.

Intel 1st tier Dealers purchase microprocessors in excess of end demand solely to strip margin values, including consumer transport charge, prior to reselling overage into secondary broker channels.

PC Dealers who are Intel’s 1st tier brokers monopolize majority of Intel margin values, including tied charge back, sustaining their Media Sales Agent artificial attractor and the cross industry distribution tie in total.

This relationship is a financially driven one, planned and implemented for Media Sales Agents to register, meter, report level’s of Intel microprocessor flows through PC dealer channels back to Intel.

That is the nature of the charge back;
for media registering and reporting back channel sales flows
through PC Companies to Intel.

Over time the system evolved into one which accelerated Dealer Product Flows artificially from one Intel product generation to the next, on the weight of Intel kickback placements meant to discharge certain Dealer inventory, to end market buyers, on an Intel time schedule. ""
Source of Post
Document the FTC, DOJ, SEC, State Attorney Generals, FBI and more know of and seem to be ignoring.. Go to www.CEOpaulOtellini.com document at top of blog...

Above Report by Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing Consultancy


Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Do You Have an Intel Corruption Tip?
Email Me...
Time to Tell the Truth about Intel Corp.
and ALL their "Corrupt Fraternity"..

This is Not Intel Nation
this is "We the People" and Intel Corp.
is Robbing Consumers, Governments and
paying Off everyone who gets in their way...
or Worse... and this is in Many Countries..

www.InvestigativeBlogger.com

Read more...

Bruce Sewell Apple's General Counsel is NOT doing His Job and Apple PR Lead Steve Dowling is Covering for Bruce Sewell

Headlines Read 
"Apple manager held on kickback charges"
- Hmmmm

My Guess is Paul Shin Devine is the fall guy for some BIGGER players..

I mean where is the Corrupt Bruce Sewell Fit into this One.. ?? and Come on a Million Dollars is NOTHING in the world of Apple, iPhone, and Computer Technology.. I Smell a RAT !! 

These Billionaire Companies often pay around $50 Million Just to Call off Mergers.. I mean what in the world is the REAL issue over a Million Dollars.. when Apple is Making Billions on Top of Billions from Technology they have Stolen or in using Technoloty that their Apple General Counsel KNOWS is Stolen such as the Iviewit Stolen Patent. 

From what I believe of Bruce Sewell, well he probably knew of Paul Shin Devine's activities and helped Paul Shin Devine pull it off.. I mean come on ... Apple PR Guy - Steve Dowling is So Absolutely full of Shit that Steve Dowling ~ Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."

So Apples Lead PR Guru, Genius Dipshit Steve Dowling Flat Out Lies Saying that Apple has Zero Tolerance for Dishonest Behavior Inside or Outside of the Company.  What a Crock Steve Dowling, Apple is part of a Massive Shareholder Fraud Coverup in the Iviewit Technologies Inc. Stolen Technology and Apple General Counsel Corrupt Attorney Bruce Sewell has known of the Iviewit Scandal for a VERY Long Time.  In Fact Bruce Sewell knew of the Iviewit Scandal before Bruce Sewell Left Intel Corp. as their General Counsel under "Mysterious" circumstances.

Wonder what Apple Lead PR Genius Steve Dowling has to Say about Apple Owing Billions to the Iviewit Technologies Company. OR What APPLE PR lead Steve Dowling has to Say about Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel and Bruce Sewell's Role in the Corrupt Intel Corp. Stealing and Using the Inviewit Technology Inventions ??? 

What Does PR Guy - Steve Dowling for Apple have to Say about the iPhone Technology that uses the Stolen Technology of the Iviewit Inventors and is VERY Known by Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ?

Steve Dowling Also .. and Seems to Be Serious as Steve Dowling Says it.. Well Steve Says, ""Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. "  - OMG How can Steve Dowling Keep a Straight Face Saying this Crap.. ?? That is a Flat Out Lie, just Look at the History of APPLE big dicking the little guy, squashing on Inventor Rights and in some cases flat out Stealing Inventions.. or Licenses to Use them..

In Todays News, that .. Well To Me is Steaming with Back Stories and Scandals Galore.. Anyway Steve Dowling Here is Todays Apple Corruption News..

"Apple manager held on kickback charges - Apple manager arrested for alleged $1M in kickbacks"

An Apple manager was arrested Friday for allegedly accepting kickbacks from Asian suppliers, totaling more than $1 million.

Paul Shin Devine worked at Apple as a global supply manager and allegedly used his position to obtain confidential information from the company, according to the San Jose Mercury News. The information was then allegedly sold to the suppliers, helping them negotiate more favorable contracts with Apple.

"Apple is committed to the highest ethical standards in the way we do business," Apple spokesman Steve Dowling said in a statement. "We have zero tolerance for dishonest behavior inside or outside the company."

The companies involved in the kickback scheme were not named in the federal indictment, but it is known that they were suppliers of iPhone and iPod accessories.

Devine allegedly opened foreign bank accounts in his wife's name to disguise payments. It's not known at this time what tipped off the FBI and IRS to the kickback scheme or how deeply Apple was involved in the investigation.

In a separate action, Apple filed a civil suit against Devine for the kickbacks he allegedly received over several years.

Devine will appear in a San Jose court on Monday. "

Source of Post on Bruce Sewell, Paul Shin Devine, Steve Dowling
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20013665-37.html

So Paul Shin Devine - Got any Secrets On Apple or on Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell ? If so I am All Blogger Ears and Ready to EXPOSE Bruce Sewell for the Corrupt, Evil, Technology Stealing, Criminal Assisting Gentleman that Bruce Sewell Really Is.. So Paul Shin Devine email me Crystal L. Cox ~ Investigative Blogger - Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Attention anyone Knowing Paul Shin Devine - My Guess is that Paul Shin Devine is being set up for something bigger and that Bruce Sewell Apple General Counsel Knows About it..

So If you know Paul Shin Devine - eMail me a Tip on this Story,
I know there is MORE to It... Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Read more...